Not sure where AI would pay off? Take the 3-minute opportunity check →
Case study · CoinDesk · 2016–2019

A news brand built to be trusted, then maintained for three years.

In 2016 CoinDesk was a bitcoin news site with a conference attached. We gave it a masthead, a style guide, a site, app screens, a newsletter, and the event brands for Consensus and Construct.

  • Brand identity
  • Style guide
  • Web and app product design
  • Event branding
  • Campaign assets
13Versions of the style guide, 2016 to 2019
4Masthead routes explored in parallel
1,500+Consensus 2016 attendees, per CoinDesk
CoinDesk project screens

The challenge

CoinDesk covered a sector where much of what got written later proved false. Its logo would sit above stories about other people's money. So the brief was not to be liked. It was to be believed.

The work also had to stretch well past a logo. The same team needed to carry the identity into a news site, a mobile app, a daily newsletter and two event brands, without the pieces drifting apart.

What we did

  1. Explore several routes, then reduce

    We ran four named masthead directions side by side, chain, morse, bubble and stacked, each with its own PDF and font report. One was printed on a shirt before any winner was picked, to see how it held up on fabric. The final mark came down to yellow and near-black, Avenir over Proxima Nova, and fifty pixels of clear space around the logo every time.

  2. Write the rules down

    The first guidelines shipped in September 2016. Ten more versions followed in twelve days in February 2017. The book explained why each choice was made, right beside the artwork, which kept thirteen versions consistent with each other.

  3. Carry it into the product

    We produced seven wireframes, then comps and a responsive set, handed off in January 2017. Six boards went in front of CoinDesk's board in December 2016. We also designed eight numbered app screens and built the CoinDesk Daily newsletter as a working email template.

  4. Keep brand and campaign together

    Consensus and Construct marks were locked in a single afternoon in July 2016. The Consensus 2017 campaign then shipped as one delivery: hero variants, banners, email headers, social assets, countdown timers and a fourteen-page sponsor prospectus.

The CoinDesk logo: a yellow letterform built from fused circles beside the lowercase wordmark coindesk in near-black.
An Illustrator artboard grid of the CoinDesk identity: the yellow mark beside the lowercase wordmark on white, a page headed why the symbol?, the mark reversed in white on a yellow field and on near-black, a typography tile, a colour specification tile, and a t-shirt mockup.
CoinDesk mobile screens side by side: an expanded news taxonomy, a collapsed nav over a bitcoin price strip, a price and network panel, a bitcoin to dollar calculator keypad, a closing-price history chart, an article screen, and a price alert screen with a notification toggle.

The result

The CoinDesk mark is still recognizably the one we drew, and the style guide was still being revised in June 2019. Consensus 2016 drew more than 1,500 industry professionals, and CoinDesk projected 2,000+ attendees from 800+ companies for 2017. Those are CoinDesk's own figures from the prospectus we designed.

Not everything held. Construct was branded but never got a campaign. We have no proof the app shipped and no traffic data for the site, so we claim neither. The tilted Consensus hexagon has since been retired. The event itself is still running.

What this means for your business

Decide what the work must do before deciding how it should look. Here the test was trust, and that one sentence settled dozens of later choices. Writing the reasons down next to the rules is what let the system survive years of edits by many hands.

This project was delivered by the Innovation Theory team, the Denver firm behind InTheory, before InTheory existed as its AI practice.

Next step

Bring one expensive workflow. Leave with a clear next step.

In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.

Book a 30-minute workflow review Not ready to talk? Take the 3-minute check

30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.

Book a 30-minute review