Annual software spend
The baseline and the saving. Track it per employee as well as in total.
Most established service businesses did not choose their software stack. It accumulated. A tool bought for one project, a subscription a former employee set up on a company card, three products that each do scheduling, and an expensive platform used for a fraction of what it can do. Nobody is quite sure what everything costs or who owns it.
A software stack audit takes stock. It lists every tool, what it costs, who uses it and what it is for, then decides for each one whether to keep it, connect it better, consolidate it or cancel it. Often the most valuable result is not a new tool but fewer tools, better configured, with someone accountable for each.
Pull every recurring software charge from card statements, accounting software and invoices. Add free tools staff rely on. For each, note cost, renewal date, contract terms, owner, number of seats and what it is used for.
Compare seats paid with seats used, using admin consoles where available. Talk to the people who use each tool about what they rely on and what frustrates them. Usage data plus conversations beats either alone.
Group tools by job: communication, files, CRM, accounting, scheduling, project tracking. Identify duplicates, features you pay for but do not use, and places where data is retyped between systems.
For each tool, make a recommendation with the reason, the saving or cost, and the risk of change. Owners approve the decisions. Contracts and renewal dates determine the order of changes.
Every remaining tool gets a named owner responsible for access, renewal decisions and value. Put renewal dates in a shared calendar and revisit the inventory at least once a year.
| Approach | Best fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Do-it-yourself inventory | Small businesses with a modest number of tools and an operations lead who has a few days to spend on it. | A spreadsheet, card statements and admin console checks go a long way. The hard part is making decisions and following through on cancellations. |
| SaaS management software | Larger teams with many subscriptions and frequent staff changes. | Tools in this category can discover subscriptions and track usage. Weigh the subscription cost against the likely savings; for many small firms a spreadsheet is enough. |
| Your IT provider or MSP | Businesses already working with a managed service provider that handles accounts and devices. | They can often report on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace licenses and security. They may be less focused on whether business applications deliver value. |
| Independent fractional technology lead | Owners who want an outside view tied to business priorities, without a vendor's interest in selling more software. | This is part of what we do. A typical first step is the inventory and usage review, then a written recommendation with savings and risks. |
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The baseline and the saving. Track it per employee as well as in total.
Unused licenses are often the quickest saving.
Fewer tools doing each job usually means less retyping, less training and less risk.
The measure of whether the stack stays under control after the audit.
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Cancelling a tool that someone relies on for an important but invisible task. | Ask users before cancelling, announce changes in advance, and keep data exports from cancelled tools for an agreed period. |
| Losing data or history when consolidating systems. | Export and verify data before migrating, run old and new in parallel briefly, and check retention requirements for your industry. |
| Former staff or contractors retaining access to systems with client data. | Use the audit to remove stale accounts, enforce multi-factor authentication and set up an offboarding checklist. |
If you have a small number of tools, each with a clear owner and purpose, a full audit is overkill. A quick annual check of renewals and seats will do. And an audit is not useful if nobody has the authority or time to act on it. Agree who will make and carry out the decisions before starting.
Start with card and bank statements for the last twelve months, then your accounting software's vendor list and email receipts. Ask each team what they use, including free tools. Admin consoles for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace show connected apps. Expect to find a few surprises.
It varies widely and we would not promise a figure. Savings typically come from unused seats, duplicate tools and plans set above what you need. The less visible gains, such as less retyping and fewer security gaps, can matter as much as the subscription savings.
Sometimes. All-in-one platforms reduce integration work but may do some jobs less well than specialist tools. A practical rule is to consolidate where tools overlap heavily, and keep specialist tools where they clearly support how you deliver work. Decide job by job.
Common findings include former employees with active accounts, shared logins, missing multi-factor authentication, and client data stored in tools nobody manages. These are often more important than cost savings. We would address access and authentication issues first.
A full review once a year is reasonable for most service businesses, with renewal decisions made as each contract comes up. Keep the inventory current by requiring that any new subscription has a named owner and is added to the list before purchase.
Find overlapping MSP tools, unused licenses and vendor sprawl before your next renewal. A clear keep-cut-connect plan.
See the details →List every tool and seat your agency pays for, find overlaps and unused licenses, and decide what to keep or cancel.
See the details →Review every nonprofit system, discount and renewal, find overlap and decide what to keep, connect or cancel.
See the details →In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.