New Google reviews per month by location
Steady growth matters more than bursts for local search visibility.
Most new patients check Google reviews before they call a dentist, and many choose between two or three practices near home or work. A practice with years of excellent care can still look thin online if reviews depend on the front desk remembering to ask. Meanwhile, the patients most likely to refer friends are rarely asked when they are happiest, such as after a smile makeover or a painless crown.
Review and referral requests for a dental practice means sending a short, HIPAA-conscious request after routine visits, routing any concern to the office manager quickly, and tracking where new patients come from. It also means replying to public reviews carefully, because confirming that someone is a patient in a reply can itself be a privacy problem.
Send requests after hygiene visits and completed treatment rather than after emergency visits, and limit how often any one patient is asked in a year.
A short post-visit message asks how the visit went and offers a Google review link to every eligible patient. Anyone who reports a problem is also routed to the office manager for a call.
Make referral source a required field on new patient intake in Dentrix, Eaglesoft or Open Dental, with the referring patient named where applicable.
When a referred new patient completes a first visit, a personal thank-you note from the dentist or team is prompted automatically.
Replies to reviews are drafted for the office manager to approve, never confirming that the reviewer is a patient or mentioning any treatment.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
Steady growth matters more than bursts for local search visibility.
Shows whether service problems are being caught and fixed.
Tells you which sources bring patients and whom to thank.
Measures whether private feedback actually leads to a call.
Illustrative example: a two-location practice has 400 Google reviews at its original office and 40 at the newer one. After setting up post-visit messages for hygiene and completed treatment, both offices ask every eligible patient, with a review link and a way to share concerns privately. The office manager calls the few who report problems within a day. Over three months the newer location adds reviews steadily, and the practice tracks rating, review count and new patients from Google at each office.
We would review your Google profiles, current review requests and how referral source is captured at intake, then check what your communication tool already supports. In the first month we set up post-visit messages for one appointment type, write reply guidelines with the office manager and fix referral tracking.
Google's policies discourage selectively soliciting positive reviews, sometimes called review gating, and the FTC has addressed review practices too. A safer approach is asking all eligible patients while also offering an easy private way to raise concerns. We would design the flow around current platform policies, and your advisors can confirm the details.
Calmly, briefly and without confirming the person is a patient or discussing treatment, which could breach HIPAA. A typical reply thanks them, says the practice takes feedback seriously and invites them to call the office manager. Drafted replies save time, but the office manager should approve each one before it is posted.
If the tool receives patient names, phone numbers and appointment information from your practice management system, it is handling protected health information, so a business associate agreement is generally expected. Most dental-focused tools offer one. We would confirm the agreement and exactly what data the tool receives before connecting it.
Illustrative defaults for a dental practice. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Review and referral requests: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.