Days from discovery call to proposal sent
The clearest measure of whether partners stopped being the bottleneck.
In most consulting firms the partner who ran the discovery call writes the proposal, usually late at night, by copying the closest past SOW and editing it. Scope, assumptions, phasing, staffing and fees all live in their head. When that partner is deep in delivery, proposals wait, and a warm prospect has a week to talk to another firm.
We would capture discovery inputs in a consistent structure, connect them to your approved methodology language, rate card and staffing assumptions, and generate a first draft of the proposal and SOW. The partner reviews scope, adjusts pricing and sharpens the approach. A junior team member can prepare the draft, so the partner's time goes to judgment.
Collect approved methodology descriptions, phase templates, standard assumptions, exclusions, team bios and case summaries the firm is permitted to share, with one current version of each.
Use a short discovery template covering objectives, stakeholders, timeline, budget signals, constraints and success measures, completed from the call transcript and reviewed by the partner.
Use past engagements from your PSA or time tracking tool to suggest phase hours and staffing mixes, which the partner adjusts based on this client's complexity.
The system assembles a draft in your template in PandaDoc, Word or Google Docs, with scope, deliverables, timeline, assumptions and a fee table built from the rate card.
The partner approves scope, fees and risk language, and the firm's standard MSA or terms are attached. Nothing goes to the prospect without that sign-off.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The clearest measure of whether partners stopped being the bottleneck.
Shows how much senior time is returned to delivery or selling.
Confirms speed is not coming at the expense of quality.
Consistent assumptions should reduce disputes in delivery.
For example, in an illustrative case a partner at a 25-person operations consultancy finishes a discovery call with a distributor on Monday afternoon. An analyst fills the discovery template from the transcript that evening. By Tuesday morning there is a draft SOW with a three-phase assessment, standard assumptions, suggested hours drawn from four similar past projects and a fee table. The partner cuts one phase, raises the estimate for stakeholder interviews and sends it Tuesday afternoon.
In the first 30 days we would review your last ten proposals and SOWs, measure turnaround and partner time, document how partners estimate and price, and assemble the first version of the content library. The partners would approve all reusable language before any drafts are generated.
The insight is bespoke, but much of a proposal is not: firm overview, methodology phases, standard assumptions, team bios, terms and fee tables. Templating those frees the partner to spend time on the parts that win the work, which are the problem framing and the approach for this specific client.
Not necessarily. PandaDoc and Proposify help with templates, e-signature and tracking when a prospect opens the document. Many firms do well with Word or Google Docs templates and a clean content library. We would recommend a tool only if your proposal volume and need for tracking justify it.
We would not replace their judgment. We would use your own historical time data to suggest a starting point by phase and role, so the partner adjusts from evidence instead of memory. Over time those suggestions improve as more completed engagements feed the history.
Illustrative defaults for a consulting firm. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Proposal and quote automation: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.