Households reviewed on schedule by tier
The core service measure and the clearest leading indicator of retention.
Advisory relationships rarely end with an argument. They end quietly: reviews that slip from annual to never, a client moving cash to an online bank, a spouse who never attended meetings and inherits the account, or adult children who have never met the advisor. By the time a transfer-out notice arrives from the custodian, the decision was made months earlier.
Retention workflows for advisory firms make sure each household receives the service its tier promises, and surface warning signs early enough to act. That means review scheduling driven by the CRM, simple signals pulled from portfolio data, and a regular list for each advisor of households that need a call. The advisor decides what to do; the system makes sure nobody falls through the gaps.
Define how many reviews and touchpoints each tier receives, record it in the CRM and generate scheduling tasks automatically so overdue households stand out.
A weekly report flags large or unusual outflows, households with no contact in a set period, and households where key family members have no relationship with the firm.
Each advisor gets a ranked list of households needing attention with the reason, such as overdue review or significant outflow, instead of a dashboard they will not open.
For each flagged household an assistant drafts a personal check-in or meeting invitation based on recent notes and the flag, which the advisor edits before sending.
Retained, reduced and lost relationships are recorded with reasons, so the firm can see whether outreach changes results and what drives attrition.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The core service measure and the clearest leading indicator of retention.
The outcome that matters, measured annually and compared over time.
Shows whether warning signals are being acted on.
A simple measure of next-generation relationship coverage.
For example, the weekly report flags a long-standing household that moved a significant sum to an outside bank and has not had a review in 14 months. The CRM also shows the spouse has never attended a meeting. The advisor receives the flag with a drafted note suggesting a review that includes both spouses, edits it and sends it. In the meeting the couple explains a home purchase, and the advisor updates the plan. An illustrative example of how a flag becomes a conversation.
We would pull your household list, review dates and last year's lost relationships, and check how many lost households showed warning signs beforehand. That tells us whether this is worth building. Then we agree tier promises with your advisors and pilot a weekly flag list with one advisor team.
We would be cautious with that claim. With a few hundred households there is not enough data for a reliable prediction model. Simple, explainable signals such as overdue reviews, unusual outflows and missing family relationships are more useful, and advisors trust them because they can see why a household was flagged. The judgment stays with the advisor.
Most custodians and portfolio systems provide transaction and balance data through downloads, reports or integrations. We would start with what your portfolio system already aggregates, since Orion, Black Diamond and Tamarac pull custodial data regularly, and build the signals from there instead of connecting to the custodian directly.
It is one of the most practical retention levers an advisory firm has. The workflow tracks which households have adult children or a spouse with no relationship with the firm, and prompts the advisor to invite them to a review or family meeting, always with the client's permission. Over time the firm can see whether those relationships grow.
Illustrative defaults for a financial advisory firm. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Renewal and retention reminders: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.