Hours from signed contract to project ready for time entry
Staff cannot charge time accurately until the project exists. Faster setup means fewer misallocated hours.
When an architecture firm wins a project, someone creates it in Ajera or Vantagepoint, builds a folder structure on the server, sets up a Revit project, adds contacts to Outlook, updates the CRM and starts a Teams channel. Each step is typed by hand, often by different people, and names never quite match. Six months later nobody can find the right folder.
Systems integration connects the tools you already pay for so that a signed proposal creates the project in one place and the rest follows. It is usually modest work with Power Automate, Zapier or native connectors. Sometimes the right answer is simply a project setup checklist and naming standard.
List every system a new project touches, who enters what and where names or numbers drift. This map often shows that two or three connections solve most of the problem.
Decide where project numbers, budgets, contacts and files are owned. For example, project accounting owns numbers and phases, the CRM owns client relationships, SharePoint owns documents.
When a project is created in your accounting system, an automation builds the standard folder structure, Teams channel and CRM record using the same project number and name.
Client and consultant contacts move to a shared CRM or directory, and project status changes in accounting update the CRM, so marketing and principals see current information.
Each automation logs failures to a named person and is documented in plain language, so the firm is not dependent on one technical employee or outside contractor.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
Staff cannot charge time accurately until the project exists. Faster setup means fewer misallocated hours.
A simple audit of project numbers across systems shows whether the integration is holding.
Captures the admin time saved across accounting, IT and project management.
For example, a 35-person firm signs a library renovation. The office manager creates the project in Vantagepoint with phases from the approved proposal. Within minutes, an automation builds the standard SharePoint folders, a Teams channel and a CRM record using the same project number. The PM's team can charge time the next morning instead of the following week. This scenario is illustrative, and the exact connections depend on your systems.
In the first 30 days we would map every system involved in starting a project, time the current setup, and list naming and data mismatches. Then we would agree sources of truth and pick the one or two connections that remove the most retyping.
It limits what can be automated, but does not stop the work. Some firms keep Revit central models on local servers or a dedicated platform for performance reasons. We would look at what lives where and why before suggesting any migration, since moving large model files is a project in itself.
Vantagepoint includes CRM features, and some firms use them well. Ajera and CORE firms often add a light CRM such as HubSpot for pursuits and relationships. The right answer depends on how many pursuits you track and who uses the information. Sometimes a well-kept spreadsheet is enough.
We would document each automation in plain language, set failure alerts to a named staff member and keep credentials under firm-owned accounts. The design aim is simple, standard connections your IT provider or office manager can support, rather than custom code only one person understands.
Illustrative defaults for an architecture firm. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Systems integration: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.