Day of month invoices are sent
Every day of delay is a day added to cash collection. Earlier invoicing is often the simplest cash flow improvement available.
In many architecture firms, billing is the most delayed process in the office. The bookkeeper prepares drafts from Ajera, Vantagepoint or CORE, then waits for each PM to confirm percent complete by phase and for a principal to review every invoice. By the time invoices go out, the month is half over. Collections depend on a principal feeling comfortable calling a client they also need for the next project.
A better workflow drafts invoices from hours and phase progress, highlights only what needs a decision, and routes approvals in one batch. Overdue invoices get consistent, courteous reminders on a schedule, and the principal only steps in for real disputes.
At month end, drafts are generated from hours, phase budgets and reimbursables in your project accounting system, with a suggested percent complete based on hours burned and the PM's last update.
Each draft shows a short summary: billing ahead or behind hours, unbilled reimbursables, additional services not yet authorized. Routine invoices are marked as routine.
PMs confirm or adjust percent complete in one quick screen, and the principal approves the batch, spending time only on the flagged invoices rather than every line.
Reminders go out at agreed intervals, for example at 15, 30 and 45 days, using wording the principal approved. Replies with disputes or questions go straight to a person.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
Every day of delay is a day added to cash collection. Earlier invoicing is often the simplest cash flow improvement available.
Shows whether consistent follow-up is shortening how long clients take to pay.
Missed reimbursables are lost revenue. Tracking them shows whether the drafting step is catching them.
Confirms the flagging is working and senior time is going to the invoices that need it.
For example, a 15-person studio has 28 active projects. Under the old process, invoices went out around the 18th. With drafts generated on the 1st, PMs confirm percent complete in a 10-minute session, and the principal reviews only six flagged invoices, including one with $2,400 in unbilled consultant pass-throughs. The batch goes out on the 4th. These figures are illustrative, but moving invoicing earlier is often worth more than any collections tactic.
In the first 30 days we would review the last three months of billing: when invoices went out, how long approvals took, aging by client and missed reimbursables. Then we would agree a target invoice date and a reminder schedule, and set up drafts for one billing cycle.
Yes, the drafting step can produce whatever format each client requires, including forms based on AIA billing documents or client-specific portals. Some institutional clients require invoices uploaded to their own systems, which may stay a manual step. We would map each client's requirements during the diagnostic.
Not if the wording is courteous and the schedule is reasonable. Many clients prefer a clear reminder to an awkward call from the principal. Reminders stop automatically when payment posts, and any reply goes to a person. You choose which clients, if any, are excluded.
The aim is the opposite. Drafts and reminders reduce the chasing a part-time bookkeeper does. We would design the process around their hours and check after the pilot whether their time on billing went down. If it did not, we would change the approach.
Illustrative defaults for an architecture firm. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Invoicing and collections follow-up: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.