Median time to first response by category
Shows which queues are now moving and which still lag, rather than one blended average.
Patient portal messages have become a second phone line. Refill requests, form requests, billing questions, scheduling changes and genuine clinical concerns all land in the same inbox, often addressed to a provider who sees them between patients. Medical assistants sort what they can, but messages wait, patients call to follow up, and the provider inbox becomes an evening chore.
We would set up triage that sorts each message by type, routes it to the right team and drafts a reply for routine requests like a records release or a refill status. Anything clinical goes to the nurse or provider queue untouched by drafting. A person sends every reply, and we measure whether response times and provider inbox load actually fall.
Define five or six categories such as refills, scheduling, billing, forms and records, and clinical questions, with a named team and target response time for each.
A classification step tags every portal message and phone note by category and flags possible urgent language for immediate nurse review, before anyone opens it.
Billing questions go to billing, scheduling to the front desk, refills to the refill nurse, and clinical questions to the care team, so providers see only what needs them.
For administrative requests, a draft reply is prepared from approved templates. Staff edit and send. Clinical messages get no AI draft unless providers later choose to pilot one.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
Shows which queues are now moving and which still lag, rather than one blended average.
The point is to take administrative work off providers, so their message volume should fall.
Every misroute adds delay. A sample review each week shows whether the categories and rules are holding up.
If patients stop calling to chase portal messages, response times have improved enough to notice.
For example, an illustrative five-provider primary care group receives a few hundred portal messages a day. A review shows that a large share are refills, forms and billing. After triage is set up, those categories route straight to the refill nurse, front desk and billing, with draft replies for forms and billing. Providers receive clinical questions only. The practice manager reviews 25 routed messages each Friday and tracks provider inbox counts against the baseline month.
We would export two weeks of portal messages and phone notes, have staff categorize a sample, and measure current response times by type. From that we would agree categories, owners and target times with the practice manager and lead nurse, then pilot routing for administrative messages first.
Most EHR portals let patients choose a message type, and some have routing rules. The problem is that patients often pick the wrong type or skip it. We would start with your existing routing, see how accurate patient-chosen categories are, and only add classification where it clearly improves accuracy.
That is why we would limit drafting to administrative requests at first, using approved templates as the base. Clinical replies stay with the care team. If providers later want to try AI-drafted clinical replies, that would be a separate pilot with provider review of every draft and a clear decision from the medical director.
Many practices already have standing refill protocols nurses follow for stable chronic medications. Triage can route refill requests to that nurse with the medication, last visit date and pharmacy pulled forward. The nurse or provider still approves every refill in the EHR; software only gathers the information.
Illustrative defaults for a medical practice. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Customer support triage: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.