Denials for authorization or documentation
The direct cost of missed tracking, measured from remittance denial codes.
PT documentation rules stack up quickly. Medicare needs a certified plan of care and progress reports at least every ten treatment days. Commercial plans and managed vendors such as eviCore or ASH approve a set number of visits within a date range. Workers' comp adds its own forms. Miss one and visits are delivered without coverage.
Most clinics track this partly in the EMR and partly in spreadsheets kept by one biller, which works until that person is on vacation. We would bring due dates into one view that therapists and the desk see before each visit, so the work happens on time rather than after a denial arrives.
For each active patient, show plan of care end date, certification status, progress note due visit, and authorized visits used versus approved, pulled from the EMR and auth records.
When a patient is two visits from an auth limit or a progress note, the desk and therapist see it on that day's schedule, not after billing.
Unsigned certifications trigger scheduled follow-ups to the physician's office by fax or portal, with escalation to the office manager after a set number of attempts.
The biller receives a task to request more visits with the latest progress note attached, early enough for the payer's turnaround time.
License expirations, CPR, continuing education and required training are tracked in one place with reminders to staff and the manager.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The direct cost of missed tracking, measured from remittance denial codes.
Shows how often care is given before coverage is confirmed.
Long waits create claim holds and Medicare compliance risk.
Measures how often billing waits on notes or certifications.
For example, a clinic sees many patients on plans managed by a utilization vendor that approves visits in blocks. The biller tracks approvals in a spreadsheet and finds about a dozen visits a month delivered after an authorization ran out. A daily flag on the schedule two visits before the limit, plus a task to request more visits with the latest note, would prevent most of these. At an illustrative $95 per visit, that is over $1,000 a month in avoided denials.
In the first 30 days we would pull six months of denials by reason code, review how auths, certifications and progress notes are tracked today, confirm payer rules with your biller, and agree a pilot due-date view inside the EMR or a covered tracker.
Many EMRs track plan of care dates and progress note intervals, and some track authorizations. The gaps are usually in setup, payer rules that differ from defaults, and nobody reviewing the alerts. We would start by configuring what you already own and only add a separate tracker if the EMR cannot hold the rules you need.
AI tools can draft text from prior notes and measurements, and some EMRs now offer this. A therapist must still review, edit and sign every note, because it supports medical necessity and billing. We would treat drafting as a separate decision from due-date tracking, and only pursue it with your clinical director's agreement.
No tool makes a clinic compliant on its own. Tracking helps your team meet requirements they already know about, consistently. Interpretation of Medicare, payer and Colorado rules belongs with your billing lead, compliance advisor or attorney. We would document the rules they set and make them visible in daily work.
Illustrative defaults for a physical therapy clinic. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Compliance documentation: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.