Visits per plan of care
The headline retention number, compared to the visits prescribed.
Most PT revenue lives in visits five through twelve. Patients who stop after a few sessions rarely call to say so. They feel somewhat better, miss an appointment, do not rebook and quietly drop off the schedule. The clinic loses the visits, the therapist loses the outcome, and the referring physician hears nothing.
Retention in PT is not a renewal contract. It is noticing early that someone has no next visit, has cancelled twice or has a high copay, and getting a person to reach out before the patient decides they are done. The outreach should feel like care from the clinic, not a sales sequence, and it should be measured against visits actually completed.
From EMR data, list active patients with no future visit, two or more recent cancellations, or a long gap since the last visit, sorted by plan-of-care visits remaining.
Simple rebooking goes to the front desk. Patients who mentioned pain, frustration or progress concerns go to the treating therapist for a short personal call.
A short message from the clinic asks how the patient is doing and offers times. Replies route to the desk, and no clinical detail appears in the text.
Staff log a simple reason code, such as cost, schedule, feeling better or unhappy, so patterns show up and the clinic can fix root causes.
Visits per plan of care and drop-off reasons are reviewed by therapist and payer, as coaching and front-desk process input rather than a scorecard.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The headline retention number, compared to the visits prescribed.
Episodes ending without a formal discharge visit show how many patients leave without finishing.
Shows whether check-ins actually bring patients back.
Turns anecdotes into a list of fixable causes such as cost, hours or communication.
For example, a clinic averages 7.5 visits per plan of care against roughly 11 prescribed. A daily at-risk list shows about 25 active patients with no next visit at any time. The desk texts and calls them, therapists phone the six who reported frustration, and half rebook. Raising the average by even one visit across 80 new patients a month, at an illustrative $105 per visit, is about $8,400 a month in completed care.
In the first 30 days we would calculate visits per plan of care and self-discharge rates from your EMR for the last six months, review a sample of discharged charts with the clinic director, design the daily at-risk list and outreach split, and pilot it at one location.
No. It is closer to clinical follow-through. The goal is that patients who need more treatment get a timely, human prompt, and those who are done get a proper discharge with outcome scores. Marketing to former patients months later is a separate activity with different consent and messaging rules.
Most EMRs have a report for this, and some, such as Jane and Prompt, make it fairly easy to filter. The gap is usually that nobody runs it daily or owns the follow-up. We would start with the built-in report and only add tools if the list needs data the EMR cannot combine, such as copay amounts or message replies.
For patients who mentioned pain or frustration, a short call from their own therapist is often the most effective step. For simple scheduling gaps, the desk is faster. We would agree a split that respects treatment time, and measure whether therapist calls are worth the minutes they take.
Illustrative defaults for a physical therapy clinic. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Renewal and retention reminders: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.