Patient A/R over 90 days
The share of patient balances aging past 90 days is where write-offs come from.
High-deductible plans mean PT patients often owe more after the payer processes the claim than they paid at the desk. A patient who paid a $40 copay may later owe $90 per visit until their deductible is met. Statements arrive weeks after treatment, often confusing, and patients who have already discharged are hard to reach.
Better collections start at the front desk with estimates, then continue with clear statements, text-to-pay links and a steady follow-up schedule. Your billing team stays in charge of payment plans, disputes and anything sent to collections. The aim is fewer surprises for patients and fewer small balances aging past 120 days.
At intake, staff use eligibility results to estimate per-visit patient cost and explain it plainly. The estimate is saved so later statements match what the patient was told.
Once the payer's remittance posts, the patient receives a clear electronic statement with visit dates, what insurance paid and a secure payment link.
Reminders follow at set intervals, such as 7, 21 and 45 days, with a softer tone for active patients and an offer to call billing with questions.
Balances above a set amount or age go to the billing lead for a call, a payment plan offer or a decision on next steps.
Billing reviews patient A/R by age bucket and payer type weekly, checking which reminders get paid and where disputes come from.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The share of patient balances aging past 90 days is where write-offs come from.
Shows whether faster statements and payment links change behavior.
Collecting the estimated amount at the visit avoids most later follow-up.
Rising disputes suggest estimates or statements are unclear.
For example, a clinic carries $45,000 in patient A/R, with about $18,000 over 90 days. Statements go out by mail once a month. After moving to electronic statements with a pay link within a few days of remittance, plus three reminders, the clinic collects more of the newer balances before patients discharge. Recovering even a third of what would have aged out is an illustrative several thousand dollars a quarter, plus fewer billing calls.
In the first 30 days we would review patient A/R aging and write-offs for the past year, map how estimates, statements and reminders work today, check what your EMR and payment processor already support, and agree a pilot reminder schedule with the billing lead.
Clear, early, polite messages usually reduce frustration compared with a surprise bill months later. The key is tone, accuracy and an easy way to ask a question. We would draft messages with your billing lead, test them on a small group and watch disputes and complaints closely in the first weeks.
No. Many clinics outsource insurance billing and keep patient collections in-house, or vice versa. We would map who does what today and improve the handoffs. Sometimes the right move is a clearer contract with your billing company about patient statements rather than any new software.
Some clinics do this with signed consent and a clear policy, often with a notice before each charge. It is a business decision with patient-relations and payer considerations. We would help you set up the workflow and records if you choose it, while the policy itself stays with the owner and billing lead.
Illustrative defaults for a physical therapy clinic. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Invoicing and collections follow-up: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.