Subs on site with a lapsed or noncompliant COI
The core risk; the target is zero, checked weekly.
Compliance paperwork in construction never lets up: certificates of insurance with the right additional insured endorsements, subcontractor W-9s and licenses, OSHA training records, toolbox talk sign-ins, certified payroll on public jobs, and closeout binders full of warranties and O&M manuals. It is rarely hard work. It is constant work, and the gaps show up at the worst possible time.
A scoped improvement would build a single tracker of required documents per sub and per job, with expiration dates read from the documents themselves. Automated reminders go to subs before things expire, and missing items are listed for the project coordinator. A person still reviews coverage and decides whether a sub is cleared to mobilize.
Each contract's insurance limits, endorsements, licensing and payroll reporting requirements are recorded once, so the tracker knows what each sub owes on each job.
When a COI or license arrives, an extraction step reads carrier, policy dates and limits and compares them with the job's requirements, flagging shortfalls for review.
Subs receive polite automated reminders 30 and 10 days before a document expires, with a link to upload the replacement directly.
Toolbox talks, training cards and inspection checklists are captured by mobile form in the field and filed by job and date, so they can be pulled in minutes.
Warranties, O&M manuals and as-builts are requested as each scope finishes rather than at the end, so the closeout package builds over the life of the job.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
The core risk; the target is zero, checked weekly.
Shows whether reminders are doing the chasing instead of people.
Directly affects when final payment and retainage are released.
A practical test of whether records are actually organized.
For example, a GC running a summer school renovation has 18 subs, prevailing wage requirements and a hard August deadline. The tracker shows two subs whose COIs expire mid-July and one missing the required primary and noncontributory endorsement. Reminders go out in June, the coordinator resolves the endorsement gap before mobilization, and weekly certified payroll is collected through one upload link. This example is illustrative.
We would review your subcontract insurance requirements, the current tracking spreadsheet, and a sample of COIs from active jobs. Counting how many are expired or missing endorsements today gives the baseline. Then we choose the pilot scope: COIs alone, or COIs plus closeout documents.
No. We help organize, track and remind. Your insurance broker, attorney and contract documents determine what coverage is required. The system simply makes it easier to see whether each sub has provided what the contract asks for, and when it runs out.
Some contractors benefit from one, especially with a large sub base. Others do fine with a structured list in Procore or Microsoft Lists plus automated reminders. We would compare the cost against your sub count and how often COIs cause problems today.
Typed or neatly handwritten sheets often extract reasonably well, and field forms on a phone avoid the problem entirely. For records that may matter in an incident investigation, we would always keep the original image alongside any extracted data.
Illustrative defaults for a general contractor. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Compliance documentation: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.