Estimator hours per bid
Shows whether the draft actually saves time or just moves the work to checking.
On a busy bid week, an electrical estimator might be counting receptacles on one set of drawings, measuring feeder runs on another and waiting on a switchgear quote from Graybar for a third. The counting and pricing lookups take hours. The judgment calls about labor units, access, phasing and exclusions are what actually win or lose the job.
Estimating support moves the repetitive parts off the estimator's desk. Device counts, fixture schedules and supplier pricing get pulled into a draft that matches your assembly library in Accubid, McCormick or ConEst. The estimator reviews it, adjusts labor and sets the number. Nothing goes to a GC without a person signing off.
Review your Accubid or McCormick assemblies with your lead estimator, retire duplicates and agree on standard labor factors, so every draft starts from the same consistent base.
Use Bluebeam count tools and structured markups to export quantities by sheet and area, then map them to assemblies automatically instead of retyping into the estimating software.
Read quotes from CED, Graybar or Border States and match line items to your price database, flagging anything that changed since the last bid or has an expiring quote date.
The estimator checks quantities against drawings, adjusts labor for site conditions, adds exclusions and qualifications, and signs off before a number is released.
Record the bid amount, competing numbers if known and the outcome, so you can see which job types and GCs are worth bidding next season.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
Shows whether the draft actually saves time or just moves the work to checking.
More capacity should mean fewer declined invitations to bid.
Tracks how often the estimator has to fix extracted counts, which tells you if the drawings or the process need work.
Confirms faster bids are still competitive and profitable, not just more numerous.
For example, picture a Denver contractor bidding a 20,000 square foot office tenant finish. Today the estimator spends most of a day counting devices, fixtures and data drops, then keys them into Accubid. With structured Bluebeam counts mapped to standard assemblies, a draft is ready by mid-morning. The estimator spends the afternoon on what matters: the lighting control package, access constraints and phasing with the GC. The numbers here are illustrative, and the real saving would be measured against your own baseline.
In the first 30 days we would sit with your estimators, time three or four recent bids from invitation to submission, and review your assembly library. Then we would pick one job type, such as tenant finishes or service upgrades, agree on a baseline and define what a good draft looks like.
Not reliably enough to bid from. Drawing quality varies, symbols differ between engineers and specs often contradict plans. Current tools can help count and classify, but an experienced estimator still needs to verify quantities and apply judgment. We would set it up as a draft generator with clear review steps, not an autopilot.
Usually not. Most of the gain comes from cleaning up your assembly library, standardizing how markups are done in Bluebeam and connecting supplier pricing to the tool you already use. We would only suggest a change if your current software cannot export or import the data you need, and we would show you the trade-offs first.
We would make quote dates and price changes visible in the draft. Line items with older pricing or expiring supplier quotes get flagged, so the estimator can request updated numbers or add an escalation note. The decision on how to carry pricing risk stays with your team.
Illustrative defaults for an electrical contractor. Replace them with your numbers.
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Estimating support: full guide
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.