RFQ turnaround in business days
Buyers often award to the first credible quote, so this drives win rate.
Small manufacturers · Estimating support
Turn RFQs into reviewed quotes in days instead of weeks
A typical RFQ arrives as an email with a PDF drawing, a STEP file and a quantity schedule. The estimator opens the drawing, works out material and stock size, sketches a routing, checks whether a similar part was run before, and emails the plater and heat treater for outside processing prices. A complex part can take hours, and the RFQ pile grows behind it.
How it often works today
- Estimators read every drawing from scratch and retype material, dimensions, finish and quantity into the ERP or a spreadsheet.
- Similar past jobs exist in the ERP but are hard to find, so routings and cycle times are re-estimated instead of reused and adjusted.
- Outside processing quotes for plating, anodizing or heat treat are chased by email and hold up the whole quote for days.
- Turnaround stretches to a week or more during busy periods, and buyers award jobs to whoever responded first.
We would time that process on real RFQs and find where the hours go. Often the answer is a cleaner library of past jobs and standard routings, plus a tool that reads the drawing and pre-fills material, dimensions, tolerances and finishes for the estimator to check. The estimator still owns cycle times, risk and price.
The improved workflow
Log RFQs in one place
Capture every RFQ with customer, part numbers, quantities and due date in the ERP or quoting tool, so turnaround and backlog are visible from day one.
Pre-fill from the drawing
Extract material, overall dimensions, critical tolerances, finish and notes from the drawing and model into a draft estimate, flagged where the tool is uncertain.
Match to past jobs
Suggest similar parts the shop has run, with their actual routing and run times, so the estimator adjusts a proven starting point instead of starting blank.
Request outside processing early
Send standard requests to approved vendors for plating, heat treat or other outside operations as soon as the RFQ is logged, not after the routing is finished.
Estimator prices and approves
The estimator reviews the draft, sets cycle times, margins and quantity breaks, and approves the quote before it is sent to the buyer.
How we deliver this: AI automation for small business or fractional CTO leadership, scoped in writing and run over 90 days. See pricing or the sample scope.
What we would measure
Estimator hours per quote
Shows whether drafting and job matching actually save time.
Quoted versus actual hours on won jobs
Confirms faster estimates are still accurate enough to protect margin.
Quote hit rate
The commercial outcome that faster quoting is meant to improve.
Where people stay in control
- The estimator approves every price, cycle time, quantity break and lead time before a quote goes out.
- Drawings under NDA, ITAR or CUI controls are only processed in tools approved for that data, or by hand.
- Extracted tolerances and notes are checked against the drawing, since a missed callout can cost far more than the time saved.
Example
Illustrative: a bracket family RFQ
For example, an aerospace customer sends an RFQ for six aluminum brackets with anodize and a few tight tolerances. The draft estimate pre-fills material and finish from each drawing, flags two tolerances for review and suggests three similar brackets the shop ran last year with actual run times. The anodize request goes to the shop's usual vendor the same morning. The estimator adjusts cycle times and sends the quote in two days. This is illustrative.
Tools typically involved
Paperless PartsJobBOSS²E2 Shop SystemProShop ERPSOLIDWORKS
What the first 30 days look like
In the first 30 days we would time ten recent RFQs from receipt to quote sent, review how past jobs are stored in your ERP, check customer data rules with your quality lead and pick one part family for a pre-fill and job-matching pilot.
Common questions
Can AI estimate cycle times accurately?
Not reliably on its own, and it should not be trusted to. Cycle times depend on your machines, fixturing, operators and material. The useful part is pre-filling what is on the drawing and finding similar jobs with real run data. The estimator adjusts from there and owns the final number.
Should we buy a quoting tool like Paperless Parts?
It suits many CNC and fabrication shops, especially with high RFQ volume. Some shops get most of the benefit from better use of their ERP's estimating module and a clean job history. We would compare options against your RFQ mix, ERP and data rules before recommending anything.
What about ITAR or CUI drawings?
Controlled technical data needs special handling. Many cloud tools are not appropriate for it, and some require specific government cloud environments. We would identify which customers and parts carry those controls and keep them on an approved path, possibly fully manual, with your quality or compliance lead deciding.
The business case
Does it pay for itself?
Illustrative defaults for a manufacturer. Replace them with your numbers.
What this workflow costs today
a month in staff time, before any lost sales
Monthly fee + assumed tools +
Break-even: new clients a month (at first-year value)
Or: staff hours recovered and redeployed
Break-even additional revenue
Value of +1 point of win rate
First 90 days, service fee
Worth a closer lookTest the assumptions
Illustration only, not a forecast or guarantee. Recovered staff time becomes a cash saving only if spending actually declines or the time goes into paid work. Tool costs are an assumption; we replace every number here with yours before recommending a scope.
Estimating support in other industries
Auto repair shopsConstruction and general contractorsElectrical contractorsHome remodeling companiesHVAC companiesLandscaping companiesPlumbing companiesRoofing companies
Estimating support: full guide
Related guides
Next step
Bring one expensive workflow. Leave with a clear next step.
In 30 minutes we look at one recurring workflow, what it costs you today and whether there is a credible case to improve it. If there is not, we will say so.
Book a 30-minute workflow review
Not ready to talk? Take the 3-minute check
30 minutes with Phil or Martin. No technical brief, no pitch deck. Phil or Martin replies personally, usually within one business day.